Context
I had a workflow problem to explain. Slides felt loud and busy. I wanted something quieter: async or live, structured not decorative, easy to reshape with AI, and still feel like mine.
Problem
They push you toward templates and visual noise. That can be great for speed, but it quietly shapes the story. I wanted to keep the control and lose the performance.
Observation 1
When formatting disappears, only logic remains.
Observation 2
Claude can reason, restructure, and refine markdown far more effectively than slide layouts.
Observation 3
GitHub history makes iteration safe.
Observation 4
Vercel allows instant publishing without design compromises.
Observation 5
It feels intentional and controlled during live walkthroughs.
Observation 6
Tools like Gamma are powerful, but their structure influences the narrative.
This was not a design problem. It was a thinking problem.
Proposal
Markdown for the content. Claude to help re-structure. Cursor to turn it into a site. GitHub for history. Vercel for shipping. Keyboard navigation so it feels calm and intentional live.
Not a slide deck. A presentation system.
Risks
Overbuilding when a simple deck would do
This setup is not always needed. It makes sense when structure matters more than decoration, and when you care how the story feels to tell.
Optimising for control over raw speed
Owning the system can slow the first version down a bit. It pays off when you expect to revisit and refine the same story over time.
Spending time on the container instead of the message
It's easy to get lost in the system itself. The tool should stay quiet and let the thinking stay in front.
Reaching for it when it's not needed
Not every conversation needs this level of care. Part of the skill is knowing when to keep it simple.
Next Steps
For now, this is mostly a proof of concept for me. The system exists. It works. Whether it becomes something more depends on how often this kind of problem shows up again.